Real Fiscal Discipline, Not Higher Taxes and More Spending

Since 2009 began, the majority in Congress has pursued a reckless fiscal agenda that has already created a record deficit that will approach almost $2 trillion this year. The national debt has skyrocketed – so much so that every man, woman and child in America now owes over $37,000 as their share of the debt. Meanwhile, millions of jobs have been lost and American families are feeling the weight of this recession every single day.

Yesterday, the House Majority passed a flawed “pay-go” plan that, while well-intended, won’t address the fiscal problems we are facing. In fact, it would likely make things worse.

Specifically:
• It is riddled with loopholes, and weakened with broad exemptions, that would prevent real change.
• It excludes nearly 40% of the budget from any cuts.
• It fails to reduce deficits, and fails to address the existing crisis of entitlement spending.
• It’s once again being rushed through the House, bypassing the Budget Committee.

Unfortunately, I fear the measure passed yesterday will ultimately lead to higher taxes, without reducing spending or adequately addressing our enormous debt and deficits.

I supported an alternative plan put forward by Congressman Paul Ryan, which would have put real teeth into plans for fiscal discipline. This plan addressed the fundamental problem with the budget: spending and deficits. It would have prevented federal spending from growing faster than the economy; established a cap on discretionary spending, rather than exempting it as the majority’s plan does; rejected the current practice of linking higher spending and higher taxes; and reduced deficits.

We can, and should, pursue real policies to rein in spending and protect American taxpayers. Unfortunately, the House of Representatives missed a great opportunity to do that yesterday.

Advertisements

4 responses to “Real Fiscal Discipline, Not Higher Taxes and More Spending

  1. “Since 2009..congress has pursued a reckless fiscal agenda..”

    Really? Only since 2009? Crap, thats what that is. Try this, “since congress has been created…”. Do you really think you can fool us with those lies?

  2. sir,

    You’ve been in office 6 months, and you’ve convinced almost everyone here in MN that it was a mistake to elect you.

    Smell the coffee skippy or start cleaning out your desk.

    xx00

    shooby

  3. Gene Christensen

    There are a number of areas I would like to see increased spending. We could use a lot more inspectors at the FDA. We could also use more regulation on Wall St. and then “feet on the ground” to enforce that. In my “pay-go” world, I’d pay for this by ceasing those no-bid government military contracts and begin negotiating drug prices for Medicare Part D.

  4. I am so sick of the finger pointing. This country’s financial status was in a mess way before January of 2009. I would rather we were spending money domestically to fix long-standing problems than dumping more money overseas into useless wars. Please zip your partisan language and get the job done.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s